Filing Date: 2016
Case Categories: States > Minnesota
Principal Laws: Clean Water Act, Administrative Procedure Act
Description: Center for Regulatory Reasonableness, Inc. filed suit alleging that EPA’s approval and subsequent refusal to withdraw its approval of two response variables associated with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s new eutrophication criteria for rivers and streams were arbitrary, capricious, or not otherwise in accordance with the law.
Minnesota Center for Regulatory Reasonableness vs. EPA
Docket number(s): 1:16-cv-01435
Court/Admin Entity: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
CASE DOCUMENTS:
| FILING DATE | TYPE | SUMMARY |
|---|---|---|
| 07/12/2016 | Complaint | Plaintiffs filed suit seeking a mandamus, declaratory judgment, and injunctive relief against Defendant EPA |
| 03/13/19 | Reply | Defendant EPA filed a reply brief in support of their cross motion for summary judgment |
| 03/31/19 | Opinion | Court granted Defendant EPA’s motion for summary judgment and denied Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment |